Space Industry and Business News  
Analysis: USAF counterinsurgency, Part 1

Progress in security talks, but hurdles remain: Iraq FM
Talks between the United States and Iraq on a long-term security arrangement are making progress, thanks to newfound US "flexibility," Iraq's foreign minister said in an interview published Tuesday. After early stutter steps, talks between the two countries have improved, Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari told The Wall Street Journal, adding that he was cautiously optimistic that the two sides can reach agreement before a July 31 deadline. "I believe a deal is within reach, but we have to be realistic about the obstacles," he said. The negotiations center around a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) which will decide the future of the US military presence in Iraq after the current United Nations mandate expires in December. Last week Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri Al-Maliki said the talks were at an impasse over concerns that the deal infringes Iraqi sovereignty. Zebari told the daily that Washington had made concessions -- including dropping its insistence on immunity for American security contractors -- showing what he praised as a new US "flexibility." The minister also praised Washington's decision to accept the creation of a US-Iraqi operations center that would gives Iraqi officials a greater say in future US military moves. The issue of prosecuting US troops believed to have broken Iraqi law is particularly sensitive, he said. "These issues are highly politicized in Iraq and highly charged," Zebari told the newspaper. He added that Iraq, for its part, has dropped a demand that the United States protect it from from foreign threats, and said Baghdad also had agreed to accept continued US control over Iraqi air space.
by Shaun Waterman
Washington (UPI) Jun 17, 2008
The veteran military officials picked by Defense Secretary Robert Gates to take over the Air Force face a tough job redefining the service's role in what many see as the key kind of combat the U.S. military will face in the immediate future: counterinsurgency.

The problem, say many who have studied the topic, is that the things the U.S. Air Force has made its priority capabilities -- establishing air supremacy over the enemy and perfecting the timely and pinpoint delivery of high explosives -- tend to be less useful in irregular or asymmetric conflicts like those in which the U.S. military is currently engaged in Iraq and Afghanistan.

In particular, critics have singled out an over-reliance on air strikes in Afghanistan as a significant barrier to the success of a "hearts and minds" strategy on the ground, given the inevitability of "collateral damage" -- the accidental killing of civilians.

"From an Air Force perspective, we were told to plan for a different kind of war," Lt. Col. Michael Pietrucha told United Press International, commenting on the general direction of post-Cold War strategic thinking, which emphasized the potential for conventional conflicts with strategic competitors or regional powers like China or Iran.

Pietrucha, a specialist in irregular combat who until recently worked at the Air Force Warfare Center, stressed he did not speak for the service.

He added it was appropriate the Air Force had different priorities, because of its strategic roles in assuring "force projection" -- the ability of the U.S. military to strike anywhere in the world -- and in operating the nation's nuclear strike capabilities.

"We have a set of global responsibilities that require us to keep a slightly different focus," he said, adding that while counterinsurgency might be the most common kind of conflict the military would face in the immediate future, "The most common conflicts are not necessarily the most dangerous."

Other observers agree that, if the Air Force has been slow to meet the counterinsurgency challenge, they have other priorities, too.

"They have always put their emphasis on air supremacy," said a senior congressional staffer, "on the basis that unless you have that, your troops on the ground are at risk."

"The question," he added, "is whether they have overemphasized it."

One suggestion of an answer comes from the Air Force's now infamous congressional "whispering campaign" -- behind the backs of the Pentagon leadership and the administration -- to get more money for its hugely expensive new planes, the F-22 Raptor and the still-in-development F-35 Joint Strike Fighter.

In picking Gen. Norton Schwartz, the first ever non-fighter or bomber pilot to head the service, Gates has ensured that, in future, that question will be answered from a different perspective.

Gates told reporters he chose Schwartz as the new chief of staff because he "brings fresh eyes to these (procurement) issues."

"It was mobility, jointness, special operations and being very, very smart" that led him to pick Schwartz, Gates said.

Observers say the choice of Schwartz, a veteran of special operations who most recently headed the Air Force's Transport Command -- in charge of mobility and lift -- is significant given the service's culture.

"It's not something I ever expected to see in my lifetime," retired Air Force Col. Chester Richards told UPI. Richards, a strategist who has studied and written about military power for three decades, said the nomination represented a chance for the service to "reinvent itself" and "shift away from being a force that just kills people on the ground" to one that brings other capabilities to the table, more relevant to the hearts and minds mission.

The Air Force itself says it already provides those capabilities, such as surveillance and lift, the ability to move troops and materiel around the combat theater.

"No one in the world can replicate the speed, volume and flexibility of the United States' air mobility team," USAF spokeswoman Maj. Olivia Nelson told UPI. She said that, on average, an Air Force mobility aircraft was launched somewhere every 90 seconds, and that in Iraq, Air Mobility Command was flying more than 200 sorties a day.

Pietrucha noted that lift, which can move relief supplies or drop packaged humanitarian rations as easily as it can ship troops and weapons, is a key capability in hearts and minds missions.

"There are lots of ways air (power) can help from a hearts and minds standpoint," said Pietrucha. "Jet noise is a great non-lethal effect �� an indicator of presence," which tells friends and foes alike on the ground that the U.S. military is there.

But he added that "kinetics" or "fires" -- striking with bombs or other ordinance -- is a central part of any combat situation.

"The delivery of weapons in a counterinsurgency environment is still a very useful capacity," said Pietrucha, "especially if you are on the ground and in contact with the enemy," he added, in a reference to "close air support" -- the use of air power to win firefights on the ground.

The problem, said Richards, is that "When you fly over and you look down, everyone pretty much looks the same," which can easily lead to errors, like the recent friendly fire killing of 11 Pakistani troops, reportedly by a U.S. airstrike.

In a study last year, Brian Glyn Williams, a professor at the University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth, found allied forces in Afghanistan were hampered in their hearts and minds mission by an over-reliance on air power.

The inevitable collateral damage from close air support actions was "the main complaint from Pashtuns" who had been displaced by the fighting, and one of the major factors fueling anger at foreign military forces, and thus potentially generating support for the insurgency.

Pietrucha said the propaganda value of reports about civilian casualties probably outweighed their truth value. "Because the adversary is the only presence on the ground, they can get their story out first -- whether it is true or not."

"We may know it's not the case (that an air strike hit a wedding party or a school), but we can't prove it, or at least not quickly enough."

In Part Two, tomorrow: How the Air Force needs to change.

Related Links
Iraq: The first technology war of the 21st century



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Type And Severity Of Combat Wounds In Iraq War Have Changed Over Time
Washington DC (SPX) Jun 17, 2008
The transition in Iraq from maneuver warfare to insurgency warfare is associated with changes in the type and severity of injuries treated by surgical units of the U.S. Marine Corps, according to a report in the June issue of Archives of Surgery, one of the JAMA/Archives journals.







  • Lower costs drawing users to mobile Internet: industry
  • Ships Face Loss Of Broadband Cover
  • Analysis: Crackdown on domain name crooks
  • Pacific students lagging in computer age: researcher

  • Russia Starts Equipment Delivery For Kourou Space Center On July 10
  • ProtoStar One Is Fueled For Its Launch From Kourou
  • Ariane 5 Lofts Twin Birds For European Defense And Turkish TV
  • OSTM-Jason 2 Satellite Ready For June 20 Launch From California

  • The Tu-144: The Future That Never Was
  • China's new jumbo-jet firm no threat to Airbus, Boeing: state media
  • China unveils new jumbo jet company: report
  • NASA And JAXA To Conduct Joint Research On Sonic Boom Modeling

  • Harris To Supply More Multiband Terminal For For US Navy Satellite Program
  • Launch Of British Military Satellite Makes It A Skynet Hat-Trick
  • SAIC Awarded Contract From DARPA To Support Deep Green Program
  • An AFSCN Legacy Satellite Control System's Last Stand

  • AF Engineers Create Thermal Control System For Space Use
  • Students Prepare For Dust Up In Space
  • Microsoft Surface computers hit Las Vegas party scene
  • Measuring How Much Information There Is In The World

  • Globalstar AppointS Thomas Colby Chief Operating Officer
  • SES AMERICOM Announces Change In Executive Management
  • Bill Flynn Joins Americom Government Services to Lead Navy Programs
  • NASA names science directorate deputy

  • NMSU Uses Information Collected In Space To Help Those On The Ground
  • Aster Images Sichuan Earthquake In China
  • Japanese astronaut says Earth is 'beautiful'
  • EarthCARE Earthcare Satellite Contract Signed

  • Honeywell To Provide Electronic Navigation For Future Soldier Program
  • GPS footwear And FindU Enter The CIS
  • NAVTEQ and Radio Shack Team Lead Development Of PND Market In Mexico
  • National Instruments Introduces New LabVIEW Toolkit For GPS Receiver Testing

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright Space.TV Corporation. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space.TV Corp on any Web page published or hosted by Space.TV Corp. Privacy Statement