Space Industry and Business News  
When Getting MAD Does Not Work Part Two

Although current developing boost-phase technology focuses mainly on ballistic missiles armed with nuclear warheads, the concepts and programs it explores are equally applicable to ballistic missiles carrying other kinds of kill mechanisms -- such as those that threaten U.S. forward-deployed forces.
by Loren B. Thompson
Arlington, Va. (UPI) Jan 26, 2009
It is not clear whether deterrence based on the threat of retaliation can work in a world of diverse nuclear actors.

Some experts doubted it would last even when there were only two major nuclear players, because eventually leaders would arise who were irrational or accident-prone. Today, the global landscape presents several examples of leaders who cannot be trusted to behave in ways required to maintain stable deterrence.

However, there is a different approach to dealing with ballistic missiles capable of causing mass destruction -- regardless of whether they carry nuclear, chemical or biological warheads.

It describes the benefits of intercepting ballistic missiles in the earliest, most vulnerable phase of their trajectory, known as boost phase. That is when missiles are easiest to track, and when they present the smallest number of targets that must be destroyed to negate their destructive potential.

Boost-phase interception is not an alternative to deterrence and arms control, nor is it an alternative to intercepting warheads later in their trajectory. It complements all those other approaches to nuclear security by presenting hostile countries with powerful incentives for not acquiring or launching nuclear weapons.

With regard to deterrence and arms control, boost-phase interception reduces the military value of ballistic missiles so that countries possessing them are less likely to take risks and more likely to disarm. With regard to attacking warheads later in their trajectory, boost-phase interception makes that task much easier by thinning out or entirely eliminating threats.

It is necessary to describe the ballistic-missile threat, detail U.S. government plans for countering it, and then explain why boost-phase interception offers the greatest potential for effective defense. There are already several promising approaches to achieving boost-phase interception that offer a low-cost path for moving forward.

Although current developing boost-phase technology focuses mainly on ballistic missiles armed with nuclear warheads, the concepts and programs it explores are equally applicable to ballistic missiles carrying other kinds of kill mechanisms -- such as those that threaten U.S. forward-deployed forces.

The threat posed to the United States and its allies by ballistic missiles in the hands of potentially hostile countries is complex. Ballistic missiles are built with many different ranges and carry a wide array of warheads. Some countries, such as Russia and China, are capable of using ballistic missiles to deliver high-yield nuclear warheads over intercontinental distances, and the warheads are equipped with penetration aids to confuse defenders.

Other countries have missiles of lesser range and fewer warheads with simpler features. And some countries have mastered the technologies associated with ballistic missiles but currently lack a nuclear-weapons capability.

(Part 3: The changing nature of the ballistic missile threat)

(Loren B. Thompson is chief executive officer of the Lexington Institute, an Arlington, Va.-based think tank that supports democracy and the free market.)

(United Press International's "Outside View" commentaries are written by outside contributors who specialize in a variety of important issues. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of United Press International. In the interests of creating an open forum, original submissions are invited.)

Related Links
Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com
All about missiles at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Club Of Nine Gives Missile Defense A Boost Part One
Arlington, Va. (UPI) Jan 22, 2009
Ballistic missiles equipped with nuclear warheads and other mechanisms of mass destruction are the most potent weapons that America's defenders face. The number of ballistic missiles in global arsenals has declined considerably since the end of the Cold War, but the number of nations possessing such weapons has increased. At least nine countries today have both ballistic missiles and nuclear warheads, raising doubts about whether the traditional approach to deterrence can work over the long run.







  • LBiSat And Alianza Team To Provide High-Quality VoIP To Remote Regions
  • Number of Internet users tops one billion: comScore
  • Google Slashes Costs Boosts Profits; Microsoft Fires And Yahoo Freezes
  • China wary about the power of netizens in 2009: analysts

  • Arianespace Prepares For First Launch Of 2009
  • VINASAT-1 First Of Many Says Vietnam
  • One Launch Down - More Than 20 To Go
  • Japan Launches Satellite To Track Greenhouse Gases

  • New Turbines Can Cut Fuel Consumption For Business Jets
  • Air China expects to post 'significant loss' for 2008
  • Nations demand climate plan from air, maritime industries
  • Heathrow expansion to get green light despite protests: reports

  • Communications And Power Industries Awarded Contract Supporting US Navy's NMT Program
  • Second Wideband Global SATCOM Satellite Shipped To Cape Canaveral
  • TSAT Set To Speed Up Data Rates Across The Air Force
  • Increasing Joint Battlefield Operation Effectiveness

  • Japan's Fujitsu scraps HDD head business
  • IBM to cut more than 2,800 jobs: union
  • "Spore" computer game evolving
  • Academy Researcher Develops Satellite Imaging Technology

  • George Preston Chosen For 2009 Henry Norris Russell Lectureship
  • Stevens New Director Of Communications And Public Outreach For Space Foundation
  • ATK Appoints Blake Larson To Lead Space Systems Group
  • Berndt Feuerbacher New President Of IAU

  • The Orbiting Carbon Observatory And The Mystery Of The Missing Sinks
  • With Cheney gone, Google gains sky view of VP's home
  • Advanced Polar Operational Environmental Satellite Ready For Launch
  • ABB Interferometer To Blast Into Space Aboard The IBUKI (GOSAT) Satellite

  • Pharos Unveils The Traveler 137 Smartphone
  • NAVTEQ LocationPoint Advertising Services
  • Location Based Technologies PocketFinder Wins Gear Of The Year Award
  • MSN Direct Expands GPS Navigation Services And Partner Ecosystem

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright Space.TV Corporation. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space.TV Corp on any Web page published or hosted by Space.TV Corp. Privacy Statement