 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 By Roland LLOYD PARRY The Hague (AFP) Aug 28, 2018
The United States told UN judges Tuesday they had no jurisdiction to rule on Tehran's demand for them to order the suspension of debilitating nuclear-related sanctions against Iran. Washington cited security concerns in its first legal response to a suit by the Islamic Republic, which is suffering increasing economic chaos. Iran has argued that US President Donald Trump breached a 1955 treaty with his decision to reimpose the sanctions after withdrawing from a multilateral nuclear accord. But US State Department lawyer Jennifer Newstead told the International Court of Justice in The Hague that it "lacks prima facie jurisdiction to hear Iran's claims". She argued that the United States had the right to protect its national security and other interests. The treaty "cannot therefore provide a basis for this court's jurisdiction" in the case, she said. Sanctions on Iran had been lifted under a landmark 2015 accord with the five permanent members of the UN Security Council plus Germany. In return, Tehran made commitments not to seek to develop nuclear weapons. But Trump said the deal did not do enough to curb the threat from Iran. He pulled out of the accord in May and began reimposing sanctions this month, alarming other signatories to the deal. In the first day of hearings at the ICJ on Monday, Iran's lawyers said the sanctions were threatening the welfare of its citizens and disrupting tens of billions of dollars' worth of business deals. The US lawyers held Iran to blame for its economic woes. They have "deep roots in the Iranian government's mismanagement of its own economy and repression of its own population," Newstead said. - Oil sanctions coming - Trump says the sanctions are needed to ensure Iran never builds a nuclear bomb. He accuses it of supporting terrorists. The Islamic Republic's lead representative in the case, Mohsen Mohebi, branded the sanctions "naked economic aggression". "The United States is publicly propagating a policy intended to damage as severely as possible Iran's economy and Iranian nationals and companies," Mohebi said. "Iran will put up the strongest resistance to the US economic strangulation, by all peaceful means." US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Monday dismissed Iran's claims as "meritless". The US measures have added to Iran's economic woes, fuelling strikes and protests across the political spectrum. Iran's currency has lost around half its value since April. The sanctions target financial transactions and imports of raw materials, cars and aircraft among other sectors. International companies including French oil firm Total and Germany's Siemens have suspended operations in Iran since Trump's announcement in May. A second wave of punitive measures is due to hit the OPEC member state in early November, targeting its vital energy sector including oil exports. - History of litigation - Iran's lawyers have asked the court urgently to order the suspension of the sanctions pending a definitive ruling. Newstead argued that Iran had a broader aim to "reinstate sanctions relief" altogether -- a matter she said was beyond the court's remit. The court adjourned after Tuesday's hearing until Wednesday when Iran will have the opportunity to respond to the US arguments. The ICJ is expected to take several weeks to decide whether to grant Tehran's request for a provisional ruling. A final decision could take years. ICJ judgements are binding, final and without appeal. However, whether any decision will be implemented remains unclear. Both Iran and the US in the past have ignored ICJ rulings against them. Despite the 1955 Treaty of Amity and Economic Relations, the two countries have not had diplomatic ties since 1980. rlp/txw
Iran fights US sanctions at UN court The Hague (AFP) Aug 27, 2018 Iran demanded Monday that the UN's top court order the United States to suspend nuclear-linked sanctions against Tehran, but Washington vowed to "vigorously" fend off the legal challenge. The Islamic Republic launched a suit at the International Court of Justice over US President Donald Trump's decision to reimpose sanctions that were lifted in a landmark 2015 accord. Trump says the sanctions are needed to ensure Iran never builds a nuclear bomb. But Iran's representative Mohsen Mohebi branded t ... read more
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |
del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Google
