![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() by Brooks Hays Washington DC (UPI) Sep 29, 2020
The international pet trade remains significantly under-regulated, and as a result, thousands of reptile species are being exploited. According to a study published Tuesday in the journal Nature Communications, just 9% of the world's more than 11,000 reptile species are protected by international regulations. For the study, researchers in Thailand and China expanded upon existing pet trade databases by surveying the activity of thousands of web-based reptile retailers, yielding a comprehensive depiction of the global reptile trade. Researchers looked at the origin of the most commonly traded species, as well as the their conservation status. Scientists also surveyed reports of wild capture practices in the countries where commonly traded species are found. "Based on two international trade databases and information scraped from 24,000 web pages in five languages, we found that over 36 percent of reptile species are in trade -- totaling almost 4,000 species," researcher Alice Hughes, landscape ecologist with the Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, said in a news release. Researchers found more than three-quarters of the reptile species on the international pet market remain unprotected by international trade regulations. Many of the reptiles are endangered -- plagued by population declines and habitat losses. Scientists estimate that 90 percent of species and more than half the individual reptiles involved in the pet trade are being captured from the wild. Because species are often exploited shortly after scientific description, newly discovered endemic species are especially vulnerable. "Gaps in monitoring demand a reconsideration of international reptile trade regulations," researchers wrote in their paper. "We suggest reversing the status-quo, requiring proof of sustainability before trade is permitted."
![]() ![]() Biodiversity hypothesis called into question Geneva, Switzerland (SPX) Sep 22, 2020 Biologists have long considered the origins and continued coexistence of the immense diversity of species found in our environment. How can we explain the fact that no single species predominates? A generally accepted hypothesis is that there are trade-offs, which means that no organism can do best in all conditions. One trade-off that is commonly assumed is that between gleaner organisms - which are able to acquire and consume more food than other species when resources are scarce - and exploiter ... read more
![]() |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |