. Space Industry and Business News .




.
THE STANS
Pakistan steps up rhetoric over lethal NATO raid
by Staff Writers
Islamabad (AFP) Nov 28, 2011

Supporters of Pakistan's outlawed Islamic hardliner party Jamaat ud Dawa (JD) burn an Indian flag during a protest in Karachi on November 28, 2011, against a NATO strike on Pakistan troops. Pakistan denied provoking NATO air strikes that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers and refused to accept expressions of regret over the cross-border attack that has inflamed US-Pakistani ties. Photo courtesy AFP.

Pakistan vowed no more "business as usual" with the United States after NATO strikes killed 24 Pakistani soldiers, but stopped short Monday of threatening to break the troubled alliance altogether.

NATO and the United States had sought to limit the fallout of Saturday's attack as Pakistan shut vital supply routes to the 140,000 foreign troops serving in Afghanistan and ordered a review of its US alliance.

Washington has backed a full inquiry and sent its condolences, while NATO chief Anders Fogh Rasmussen on Sunday voiced regret over the "tragic, unintended" killings, but did not issue a full apology.

In response Pakistan has dug its heels in, reacting furiously to what it called an "unprovoked" strike, worsening US-Pakistani relations already in crisis after the killing in May of Osama bin Laden north of Islamabad by US special forces.

The US military insisted the war effort in Afghanistan would continue despite the disruption to regular supply lines.

In an interview with CNN, Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani said incidents such as at the NATO cross-border attack further alienated the Pakistani masses, leaving his government isolated in its unpopular alliance with the US.

"Business as usual will not be there, therefore we have to have something bigger so that to satisfy my nation, the entire country," he said in English.

Asked whether the US-Pakistani alliance can continue, he replied: "That can continue on mutual respect and mutual interest", adding that both were currently lacking.

"If I can't protect the sovereignty of my country how can we say it's a mutual respect and mutual interest?"

White House spokesman Jay Carney said President Barack Obama believed Saturday's incident was "a tragedy," adding that Washington valued what he called an "important cooperative relationship that is also very complicated".

It remains unclear what happened at the dead of night in some of the most hostile terrain on Earth. Afghan and Western officials reportedly said the Pakistanis opened fire first. Pakistan insists the attack was unprovoked.

NATO and Afghan forces "were fired on from a Pakistani army base", a Western official told the Wall Street Journal. "It was a defensive action."

An Afghan border police commander, speaking on condition of anonymity as officials have been told not to speak to media before an investigation is completed, said NATO troops hardly ever open fire unless they are attacked.

"To me it's almost clear that they (ISAF) came under fire from that area. Without that they would have not returned fire," he told AFP.

He said the Taliban as well as Afghan and Pakistani security forces have posts very close to each other due to the rugged, mountainous terrain.

"This is not true. They are making up excuses. And by the way, what are their losses, casualties?" Major General Athar Abbas, Pakistan's chief military spokesman, wrote to AFP in a text message.

He later told Pakistani television channel Geo that 72 Pakistani soldiers have been killed and 250 wounded by fire from across the Afghan border over the last three years.

Asked about expressions of regret by NATO he said: "We do not accept it because such kind of attacks have been taking place in the past... Our leadership will decide about further reaction."

Britain's Daily Telegraph newspaper on Monday quoted wounded survivors of the raid, who insisted they were victims of an unprovoked attack.

In retaliation, Islamabad has blocked NATO convoys from crossing into Afghanistan, ordered a review of its alliance with the United States and is mulling whether to boycott a key conference on Afghanistan next month.

Pentagon press secretary George Little told reporters the Afghanistan campaign would press on despite the interruption to supply routes.

"Everyone realises we have an enemy to engage in Afghanistan and the US military is prepared to carry on," Little told reporters.

NATO says that for now its troops will not be affected by the disruption.

Hundreds of enraged Pakistanis took to the streets for a third day on Monday, blocking roads to demand that Pakistan end its troubled alliance with the United States.

Key ally China, seen by Islamabad as a crucial counterweight to American influence, said it was "deeply shocked" and called for an investigation.

On the Fox News Sunday talk show, US lawmakers vented frustration over Pakistan, with Republican Senator Jon Kyl demanding Islamabad cooperate with the United States in order to maintain billions of dollars in financial aid.

burs-pdw/gk

Related Links
News From Across The Stans




.
.
Get Our Free Newsletters Via Email
...
Buy Advertising Editorial Enquiries




US vows to 'carry on' after Pakistan cuts supplies
Washington (AFP) Nov 28, 2011 - The United States will press ahead with its war effort in Afghanistan despite Pakistan's decision to cut off supplies to NATO-led forces after lethal air strikes, the Pentagon said Monday.

Pakistan promptly sealed its border with Afghanistan to NATO supply convoys after allied strikes on Saturday killed 24 Pakistani soldiers near the border, triggering outrage in Islamabad.

But a Pentagon spokesman said the US military would not scale back its operations against Taliban-linked insurgents and expressed hope that the latest tensions with Islamabad would be resolved.

"The war effort continues," press secretary George Little told reporters.

Asked how long US and coalition forces could operate without supplies from routes running through Pakistan, he said: "I don't have a time line to share.

"But the important point to focus on is the war effort will continue. Everyone realizes we have an enemy to engage in Afghanistan and the US military is prepared to carry on."

Nearly half of all cargo bound for NATO-led troops runs through Pakistan. Roughly 140,000 foreign troops, including about 97,000 American forces, rely on supplies from the outside for the ten-year-old war in Afghanistan.

The United States also depends on Islamabad's tacit cooperation to wage war against Al-Qaeda and Taliban militants inside Pakistan, with the CIA carrying out an intense campaign of air strikes using unmanned drone aircraft.

After the air strikes, Pakistan's cabinet ministers and military chiefs ordered the United States to leave within 15 days an air base used for drone strikes against militants inside Pakistan.

The remote Shamsi air field in southwest Pakistan is reportedly used as a hub for covert CIA drone strikes, which Islamabad previously told the United States to leave in June.

The role of the air base remains unclear as the CIA also uses air fields in neighboring Afghanistan to stage missile attacks with unmanned robotic planes against suspected Al-Qaeda and Taliban militants.

US officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said President Barack Obama's administration was working on a response to a number of demands from Pakistan but gave no indication the drone operations would be dramatically cut back.

"Pakistan remains a critical counter terrorism partner, and we do not anticipate significant changes in that relationship," a US official told AFP.

The Pentagon said top government officials and commanders are working with the Pakistanis "on a way ahead" following the air strikes, which triggered outrage in Pakistan.

The top US and NATO commander in Afghanistan, General John Allen, has asked US Central Command to lead an investigation into the air strikes, Little said. The American military's Central Command oversees US forces in the Middle East and Afghanistan.

The NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) sent an initial assessment team over the weekend to the border to collect facts surrounding the incident, he said.

Pakistan maintains the air strikes were unprovoked while Afghan and Western officials reportedly say Pakistani forces opened fire first.

The White House called the attack a "tragedy" and stressed Pakistan remained a crucial partner, but officials said it was too early to conclude what led to the incident.

Both General Allen and the US military's top-ranking officer, General Martin Dempsey, spoke to the Pakistani army chief, General Ashfaq Kayani, about the incident, Little said.

"Obviously they did express their condolences and regrets but I think everyone realizes the facts need to be collected, analyzed and that the investigation needs to unfold," he said.



.

. Comment on this article via your Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail login.

Share this article via these popular social media networks
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit GoogleGoogle



THE STANS
US senator urges 'tough' Pakistan diplomacy after raid
Washington (AFP) Nov 27, 2011
A top US senator called for "tough diplomacy" with Pakistan Sunday and urged Islamabad to cooperate with the United States to maintain its financial aid, following cross-border NATO air strikes that killed 24 Pakistani troops. "There's a lot of diplomacy that has to occur and it has to be tough diplomacy in the sense that they need to understand that our support for them financially is depen ... read more


THE STANS
Kindle sales quadrupled on Black Friday: Amazon

Mapheus-3 - spherules, metals and microgravity

Recycle this: Bolivian turns waste into high fashion

Carbon nanotube forest camouflages 3d objects

THE STANS
Raytheon First to Successfully Test With On-Orbit AEHF Satellite

Lockheed Martin AMF JTRS Team Demonstrates Communications and Tactical Data Sharing At Army Exercise

Boeing Ships WGS-4 to Cape Canaveral for January Launch

Harris to maintain satellite ground system

THE STANS
Assembly milestone reached with Ariane 5 to launch next ATV

Russia launches Chinese satellite

AsiaSat 7 Spacecraft Separation Successfully Completed

Pleiades 1 is readied for launch

THE STANS
ITT Exelis and Chronos develop offerings for the Interference, Detection and Mitigation market

GMV Supports Successful Launch of Europe's Galileo

In GPS case, US court debates '1984' scenario

Galileo satellites handed over to control centre in Germany

THE STANS
US 'concerned' about EU airline carbon rules

German airline seeks Chinese, Gulf investors: report

Brazil a serious rival in air transport

Wolfram Alpha shows flights overhead

THE STANS
In new quantum-dot LED design, researchers turn troublesome molecules to their advantage

Researchers watch a next-gen memory bit switch in real time

An about-face on electrical conductivity at the interface

Graphene applications in electronics and photonics

THE STANS
UK-DMC-1 to take well-earned retirement

SSTL appoints Luis Gomes Director of EO and Science

First-class views of the world below

Indra Enhances Imaging Of Spatial Mission For The Study Of Water On Earth

THE STANS
6,000 evacuated after China chemical plant blast

Bulgaria choking on hazardous air

Environmental troubles growing in Mid-East Gulf

Using air pollution thresholds to protect and restore ecosystem health


.

The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2011 - Space Media Network. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement