. Space Industry and Business News .




.
THE STANS
Pakistan snubs US probe into lethal strikes
by Staff Writers
Islamabad (AFP) Dec 3, 2011

A Pakistani commando stands guard beside the coffins of Pakistani soldiers who were killed in a NATO strike during a funeral ceremony in Peshawar on November 27, 2011. The United States moves to salvage ties with Pakistan after NATO air strikes on border outposts killed 24 soldiers and plunged relations into crisis, backing a full probe and expressing condolences. Photo courtesy AFP.

Islamabad has so far refused to take part in a US probe into air strikes that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers, exacerbating fears Saturday of a prolonged US-Pakistani crisis as a result of the attack.

Pakistan was invited to cooperate in the probe into the November 26 strikes on the Afghan border, which enraged Islamabad and propelled US-Pakistani ties to their rockiest in years, but officials have declined to do so.

"They have elected to date not to participate, but we would welcome their participation," said Pentagon press secretary George Little.

Washington had expected a refusal given the fury in Pakistan, which has already seen Islamabad shut down NATO's vital supply into Afghanistan and boycott an international conference on the war in Bonn set for Monday.

Pakistan also ordered American personnel to leave the Shamsi air base, widely understood to have been a hub for a covert CIA drone war on Taliban and Al-Qaeda commanders in Pakistan's troubled border areas with Afghanistan.

In Pakistan, a security official told AFP on condition of anonymity Saturday that a formal reply would be conveyed to the Americans, but confirmed there was no interest in taking part in the inquiry.

"Officially our response has yet to come, but we will not participate in the investigation because there was no outcome from the two previous inquiries and we feel that third inquiry will be the same, so there's no purpose," he said.

Pakistan claims NATO attacks in 2010 and 2008 were poorly investigated.

On Friday, the Wall Street Journal quoted US officials as saying Pakistani officers at a coordination centre gave a green light for the strikes believing they had no troops in the area.

But a Pakistani official told AFP that the Americans relayed the wrong coordinates, instead for a site 15 kilometres (nine miles) to the north.

"This is totally ridiculous," he said on condition of anonymity, because he was not authorised to speak to the media.

"They thought there is some activity in that particular area... We confirmed there was no activity in that area. After some time, the same border coordination centre said we're sorry it's the wrong coordinates," he added.

Pakistan says there was then a second air strike.

"The first strike could have been a mistake. They pulled out. What was the purpose of coming again? That is the most disgusting thing," the official said.

US officials told the Wall Street Journal that Afghan forces and US commandos were pursuing Taliban fighters near the border when they came under fire from what they thought was a militant encampment.

But it also quoted officials as saying there were mistakes on both sides: "There were lots of mistakes made," one official said. "There was not good situational awareness to who was where and who was doing what."

The United States has voiced regret over the strikes but has stopped short of issuing an apology while the American military conducts the investigation.

"It's safe to say that the incident has had a chilling effect on our relationship with the Pakistani military, no question about that," Pentagon spokesman Captain John Kirby told reporters in Washington.

"Both sides deem it to be as serious as it was."

Pakistan called the strikes a "deliberate act of aggression" and army chief General Ashfaq Kayani is understood to be facing fury from the ranks and junior officers livid with the Americans.

Kayani told troops to respond to any future attack without waiting for approval from commanders in what local media interpreted as a change in the rules of engagement.

Kirby suggested the US military would also review its operations and tactics for forces stationed in eastern Afghanistan.

"Clearly, an incident like this causes you -- and should cause you -- to take a step back and look at how you're doing things and whether there need to be improvements made or any kind of tactical decisions ...(to) do things a little differently," Kirby said.

In an angry response to the strikes, Pakistan is boycotting an international conference on Afghanistan starting Monday in Bonn.

In an interview with a German weekly, Afghan President Hamid Karzai accused Pakistan, seen as vital to any prospect of stability in his war-ravaged country, of sabotaging all negotiations with the Taliban.

"Up until now, they (Pakistan) have sadly refused to back efforts for negotiations with the Taliban," Karzai told Der Spiegel weekly in comments reported in German and due to be published on Monday.

burs/jm/ac/txw

Related Links
News From Across The Stans




.
.
Get Our Free Newsletters Via Email
...
Buy Advertising Editorial Enquiries




White House refuses apology over Pakistan strike
Washington (AFP) Dec 1, 2011 - The White House on Thursday dismissed the notion of offering an apology to Pakistan over the NATO air strikes that killed 24 soldiers, insisting an inquiry was still ongoing as to how the men died.

"I, speaking for the White House and the president, offered condolences on behalf of him, the administration, the American people, for the tragic loss of life," White House spokesman Jay Carney told reporters. "It was a tragedy."

But he and other US officials have stopped short of offering any apology.

On Monday, Carney also said the weekend deaths, which provoked outrage in Pakistan and prompted Islamabad to review its alliance with the US, were a "tragedy," adding: "We take this matter very seriously."

"We mourn those brave Pakistani service members that lost their lives," the spokesman said.

The New York Times reported Thursday that US State Department officials had lobbied for President Barack Obama to make a formal statement of regret to the Pakistani people, to stem the damage to the key US-Pakistani relationship.

But according to the newspaper, which cited unnamed administration officials, the Pentagon balked at the idea, saying statements by other senior officials such as Secretary of State Hillary Clinton were sufficient.

Some administration aides also expressed concern that an apology by Obama would be used against him by his Republican adversaries in the run-up to next year's presidential election, the Times reported.

When asked why no formal White House apology was forthcoming, Carney said authorities were at the "early stages" of an investigation into the incident.

"So I think that the expression of condolences for the tragic loss of life conveys sincere sentiment... and it goes to the importance of the relationship that we have with Pakistan," the spokesman said.

Pakistan has insisted that the attack on its troops was unprovoked. The Wall Street Journal, citing Afghan and Western officials, has reported that NATO and Afghan forces called in the strikes after taking fire from the Pakistani side.



.

. Comment on this article via your Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail login.

Share this article via these popular social media networks
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit GoogleGoogle



THE STANS
Commentary: Black swans galore
Washington (UPI) Dec 2, 2011
For Pakistanis, arguably the world's most anti-U.S. population in the world, the NATO airstrike that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers at a military post at Salala in the Mohmand Tribal Agency on the Afghan-Pakistan border, was deliberate. The U.S. and NATO command immediately said they regretted the loss of life but held back any formal apology pending a thorough investigation as they say t ... read more


THE STANS
Japan baby formula shows radiation contamination

Dell abandons Android tablet in US

Smartphone snooping sparks lawsuits and denials

Microsoft adds voice search to Xbox Live

THE STANS
Astrium achieves Initial System Acceptance on Yahsat programme

Raytheon First to Successfully Test With On-Orbit AEHF Satellite

Lockheed Martin AMF JTRS Team Demonstrates Communications and Tactical Data Sharing At Army Exercise

Boeing Ships WGS-4 to Cape Canaveral for January Launch

THE STANS
Europe's third ATV is loaded with cargo for its 2012 launch by Arianespace

Assembly milestone reached with Ariane 5 to launch next ATV

Russia launches Chinese satellite

AsiaSat 7 Spacecraft Separation Successfully Completed

THE STANS
Authorities Gauge Impact of Europe's Galileo Navigation Satellite System

Russia's Glonass-M satellite put into orbit

ITT Exelis and Chronos develop offerings for the Interference, Detection and Mitigation market

GMV Supports Successful Launch of Europe's Galileo

THE STANS
Hundreds of flights cancelled due to Beijing smog

Air France suspends maintenance in China

US 'concerned' about EU airline carbon rules

German airline seeks Chinese, Gulf investors: report

THE STANS
Samsung to build flash memory chip line in China

Pitt Researchers Invent a Switch That Could Improve Electronics

The interplay of dancing electrons

Toshiba to shut three Japan semiconductor plants

THE STANS
NASA Satellite Confirms Sharp Decline in Pollution from US Coal Power Plants

China launches remote-sensing satellite Yaogan XIII

Texas Drought Visible in New National Groundwater Maps

APL Proposes First Global Orbital Observation Program

THE STANS
Chinese go online to vent anger over pollution

Smog sparks debate over Beijing air standards

No breath of relief for kids in dirty Czech steel hub

UI engineers conduct residential soils study


.

The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2012 - Space Media Network. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement