Space Industry and Business News  
MISSILE DEFENSE
NATO calls for pan-European missile shield

Russia may cooperate on anti-missile systems: NATO
Brussels (AFP) May 6, 2010 - Russia is considering cooperating with NATO on anti-missile defence systems and other areas, the transatlantic alliance's top military officer, Italian admiral Giampaolo Di Paola, said Thursday. "Missile defence has ... been named by General (Nikolai) Makarov, as an area in which we could look," said Di Paolo, referring to his Russian counterpart, following two days of talks. "But we have not gone in any specific discussion" he added, stressing that future progress "also depends on what will be developed on the political side." The 28 allied chiefs of staff agreed, during talks with Makarov in Brussels, on a joint "working plan for 2010"

That areas of cooperation in the approved plan "are limited" Di Paula admitted, to the fields of logistics, search and rescue, exchange visits and joint conferences. The chairman of the NATO Military Committee underlined that, after the freeze in relations with Moscow after the brief Russia-Georgia war in August 2008, "2010 is some sort of year of transition after the reset, in order to restart the machinery." Also Thursday, US Vice President Joe Biden visited Brussels, speaking of European security and in favour of NATO collaboration with Moscow in the anti-missile area. While this would include US hardware, the NATO chief distinguished this from the missile shield project once touted by former US president George W Bush which was drawn up to defend US territory from missile attacks overflying Europe, and was strongly opposed by Moscow.

Rasmussen said it would "make sense, from political and military perspectives, to speak with Russia" about the plans. NATO and Russia have for several years collaborated on a much more modest anti-missile programme to protect military installations and troops. Russia has been resistant, fearing an extension of the US missile shield project in Europe which could upset the conventional and nuclear balance to its own detriment. President Dimitri Medvedev in 2008 proposed rather a "security pact" stretching from Vancouver to Vladivostock.
by Staff Writers
Brussels (UPI) May 6, 2010
Building a European-wide missile shield would cost no more than $250 million, NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said.

At a news conference Wednesday at NATO headquarters in Brussels, Rasmussen said he was in favor to link and expand NATO's missile defense systems to protect the entire continent.

"NATO is already building a missile defense system to protect our armed forces when they go out on mission," Rasmussen said. "The cost of expanding that system to cover not only our soldiers but also our populations … is less than ($258 million) over 10 years spread among the 28 NATO countries."

For that money, Europe will get "full coverage geographically, as well as protection against the threats we can envisage today," he said.

Rasmussen said the comprehensive shield was needed to defend a "growing threat" from Iran.

"We have a sufficient amount of information and intelligence to know that we are faced with a real threat taking into consideration the Iranian aspirations, as regards to missile technology and nuclear programs," he said.

The system would be different from that proposed by Washington but could rely via a command-and-control system on those in place or under construction, he added.

Rasmussen said Russia should be involved in the plans from the start.

"We would very much like to explore the possibilities, to cooperate, to link the systems," he said. "In the coming months we will have discussions on that within the NATO-Russia Council."

He added NATO ministers would decide over such a shield at a summit in Lisbon in November.

NATO's push to include Russia in the missile roof follows Washington's pledge to reset relations with Moscow.

In an obvious bid to please the Kremlin, Washington last year shelved plans for a missile defense system in Poland and the Czech Republic.

U.S. President Barack Obama's predecessor, George W. Bush, pushed for the system to defend against possible Iranian nuclear missiles but the plan caused a major rift with Russia, which took it as a direct threat to its security.

Yet the architecture of Obama's new system, which is based on more mobile SM-3 anti-missile units, hasn't entirely convinced Russia, which threatened to deploy the tactical Iskander missile system in the Black Sea region and beef up its naval base across the border in the Baltics.

At a summit in Prague, Obama and his Russian counterpart Dmitry Medvedev agreed to jointly assess the ballistic missile threat, and to launch "a serious dialog" about Russian-American cooperation on missile defense.



Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com
All about missiles at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


MISSILE DEFENSE
NATO chief calls for anti-missile system for Europe
Brussels (AFP) May 5, 2010
Linking up anti-missile systems to protect NATO's European nations would cost under 200 million euros (250 million dollars) over 10 years, the alliance's secretary general Anders Fogh Rasmussen said on Wednesday. "We have a sufficient intelligence to know that we're faced with a real threat, with Iranian aspirations as regards missile technology and nuclear programmes," Rasmussen told a pres ... read more







The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2010 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement