Space Industry and Business News  
Military Matters: Iraq's new storm

disclaimer: image is for illustration purposes only
by William S. Lind
Washington (UPI) Mar 27, 2008
Most wars move not at a steady pace but in a series of fits and starts. For about half a year, we have been enjoying something of a lull in the war in Iraq. Anything that reduces casualties is to be welcomed. But the bulletins' claims that the downward trend in violence will continue should be seen more as political vaporing than military analysis. Events begin to suggest that the lull is ending and Mars is in the ascendant.

To make a prognosis, we first must understand why we have enjoyed a period of relative quiet. There are four basic causes. In order of importance, they are:

First, al-Qaida's alienation of much of its Sunni base, to the point where many Sunni insurgents changed sides. As I have pointed out before, al-Qaida in Iraq made a common error of revolutionary movements: It attempted to impose its program before it had consolidated power.

As best I can see, it seems to be persisting in that error, perhaps because its loose discipline does not allow it to do otherwise. That is good news for us. But we dare not forget that in Fourth Generation war -- 4GW -- all alliances are temporary. The Sunni Awakening militias like our money but they don't much like us.

Second, Moqtada Sadr's decision to order his Mahdi Army to observe a truce, now extended to August of this year. The truce remains in his interest, because he needs to husband his strength for a winner-take-all final gambit.

Third, moving many U.S. troops off their bases and into neighborhoods where they can try to protect the population.

Fourth, last and least, the "surge." This usefully added some additional troops for Point Three, but without the former move it would have simply created more Fobbits. A question I have not seen addressed is what percentage of the troops for Point Three were already in the country. My bet is a large majority.

If we look at where each of these four factors is now going, we see rough water ahead:

First, al-Qaida in Iraq and other anti-U.S. forces -- there are many -- are both attacking and penetrating Sunni militias now working with U.S. forces; the latter is likely to prove more effective.

U.S. forces are also killing Sunni militiamen who are working with us, by accident of course, but sufficiently often to strain relations. Much of this results from our counterproductive and just plain stupid continued use of air power in a country we occupy. American attack aircraft are al-Qaida's -- and the Taliban's -- best friends.

The most powerful alienating factor is the irreconcilable hostility between most Sunnis and the Shiite government in Baghdad. The Sunnis know we created the government and remain allied to it. The government fears any armed Sunnis. We are left with one foot on the boat and one on the dock, a position that is difficult to sustain indefinitely.

Second, Sadr is feeling increasing pressure from his "street" to respond to U.S. attacks -- again, often by aircraft -- on Shiite neighborhoods. He has quietly been using U.S. and Iraqi government forces to "whack" dissenters within his own movement. But this can easily blow back on him. At this point his "street cred" is or soon will be on the line, at which point he has to respond or see his militia fragment -- which is the natural tendency of everything in 4GW. The Mahdi Army can send U.S. casualties soaring overnight.

Third, any rise in American casualties means politicians in Washington will want U.S. troops to head back to their bases. The absurd American definition of "force protection" means many within the military will want to do the same. Gen. David Petraeus, the U.S. commander, will stay the course -- in this case, rightly -- but he's on his way out. Having gotten this right doesn't mean we won't get it wrong again.

Fourth, the extra troops brought over by the surge will go home this summer. Again, this is far less important than what the remaining troops do, and Points One and Two also, but it is a factor.

The main story of the current lull is one of lost opportunity. Whether soon or in the more distant future, the war in Iraq will get hotter again. The lull gave us what might be our only opportunity to leave Iraq with some tail feathers intact. Just as the Bush administration's blindness got us into this war, so its rigidity made us pass over our best chance to get out. Like opportunity, Mars, the God of War, only knocks once. Next time, he blows the building.

(William S. Lind, expressing his own personal opinion, is director of the Center for Cultural Conservatism at the Free Congress Foundation.)

Related Links
Iraq: The first technology war of the 21st century



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Bush: Iraq must shoulder full cost of security
Dayton, Ohio (AFP) March 27, 2008
US President George W. Bush called on the Iraqi government Thursday to shoulder the full financial burden of its security forces "soon."







  • Google sees wireless Internet on unused television airwaves
  • Japan marks funeral for second-generation phones
  • Apple iPhone aiming to dethrone BlackBerry
  • Google stock price sinks on Internet ad-slump fears

  • German military satellite launched by Russia: report
  • Russian Rockot Launch Vehicle To Orbit European GOCE Satellite
  • Cape Canaveral Airmen Launch Delta II Rocket
  • ProStar GPS Guides Players At Arizona Golf Resort

  • Europe's EADS finds sweet home in Alabama despite uproar
  • A380 superjumbo makes European debut in London
  • Aviation industry must act fast on climate change: Airbus chief
  • Northrop, EADS to invest 600 mln dlrs in Alabama site

  • Lockheed Martin Wins Contract To Support Defense Department High Performance Computing Centers
  • Northrop Grumman Ships First Beyond-Line-of-Sight IP Network To US Air Force E-8C Fleet
  • Northrop Grumman Delivers Payload Module For Second Advanced EHF Military Communications Satellite
  • Orbital Awarded Contract For System F6 Satellite Program By DARPA

  • CEE Researchers Unravel The Secrets Of Spider Silk's Strength
  • Satellites Take Sustainability To New Heights
  • Russian-Launched US Satellite Unlikely To Reach Target Orbit
  • Artemis Provides Communications For Jules Verne ATV

  • Northrop Grumman Appoints Scott Winship To VP And Program Manager - Navy Unmanned Combat Air System
  • NASA Names John Shannon New Space Shuttle Manager
  • Michael Larkin Appointed Executive Vice President Of Orbital's Satellite Business Unit
  • Boeing Integrated Defense Systems Looks To Future With Leadership Changes

  • Satellites Can Help Arctic Grazers Survive Killer Winter Storms
  • CrIS Atmospheric Sounder Completes Vibration Testing
  • Brazil, Germany To Develop Night-Vision Radar Satellite
  • NASA Goddard Delivers Aquarius Radiometer To JPL

  • u-blox GPS Powers LandAirSea Miniature GSM-Based Tracker
  • Garmin GPSMAP 495: A Feature Rich, Great Value GPS For Pilots
  • ON-PIN Joins Forces With GPS Industries
  • Motorola Brings The Power Of Touch To Mobile TV Device

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright Space.TV Corporation. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space.TV Corp on any Web page published or hosted by Space.TV Corp. Privacy Statement