Space Industry and Business News  
DISASTER MANAGEMENT
Japan upgrades nuclear emergency to highest level

earlier related report
Factfile: World scale for rating nuclear accidents
Paris (AFP) April 12, 2011 - Following is a factfile on the International Nuclear Events Scale (INES), following Japan's decision Tuesday to upgrade the gravity of the Fukushima accident from five to seven on this benchmark.

- The UN's International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) describes INES as a tool for "promptly communicating to the public in consistent terms" what a nuclear episode means. It has three factors: radioactivity releases to the public; barriers against radiation at a nuclear site; and civil-defence measures.

- Implemented in 1990, it has a zero-to-seven rating of gravity, where seven is the maximum. Levels one to three are categorised as incidents, and levels four to seven as accidents. Each increase in level on the scale indicates a roughly 10-fold increase in severity.

- There has only been one seven-rated accident, the 1986 Chernobyl disaster, and one six-rated accident, at Kyshtym, Russia, in 1957, in an explosion at a waste tank.

- There have been two five-rated accidents, comprising a fire at the Windscale nuclear plant in northwestern England in 1957 and the partial meltdown at Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania in 1979.

- Following are the steps in the INES scale, followed by some of the general criteria for listing an event:

. ZERO: Events known as "deviations" that have no safety significance

. LEVEL ONE: Anomaly

Minor problem with safety components at a nuclear facility, but significant safety margin remaining

. LEVEL TWO: Incident

Radiation levels in an operating area of a nuclear facility of more than 50 millisieverts (mSv) per hour. Exposure of a member of the public to radiation in excess of 10 mSv, exposure of a worker in excess of statutory annual limits.

. LEVEL THREE: Serious Incident

Severe contamination in an area of a facility, with non-lethal injuries such as radiation burns. Low probability of significant public exposure.

. LEVEL FOUR: Accident with local consequences

Partial meltdown or damage to fuel, release of significant quantities of radioactive material within an installation. No counter-measures likely to be needed other than local food controls.

. LEVEL FIVE: Accident with wider consequences

Severe damage to reactor core, large quantities of radioactive material released within a site. Limited release of material to the wider environment, requiring implementation of some planned countermeasures.

. LEVEL SIX: Serious accident

Significant release of radioactive material likely to require implementation of planned countermeasures.

. LEVEL SEVEN: Major accident

Major release of radioactive material with widespread health and environmental effects, requiring implementation of planned and extended countermeasures.



INES
IAEA Factsheet

by Staff Writers
Tokyo (AFP) April 12, 2011
Japan upgraded its nuclear emergency to a maximum seven on an international scale of atomic crises on Tuesday, the first time the highest ranking has been invoked since the Chernobyl disaster in 1986.

The regrading to a "major accident" with "widespread health and environmental effects" puts Fukushima on a par with the world's worst ever peacetime nuclear event 25 years ago in the then Soviet Union.

The re-assessment came as Japan continued to be rocked by powerful aftershocks from the 9.0 magnitude quake that unleashed a devastating tsunami on March 11, with a 6.3 tremor striking Fukushima prefecture Tuesday afternoon.

Japan's Nuclear Safety Agency said radiation emissions from the Fukushima Daiichi plant, whose cooling system was knocked out by last month's disaster, were equal to 10 percent of the Chernobyl catastrophe.

Safety agency official Hidehiko Nishiyama said, however, that the two events were markedly different.

"In Chernobyl, there was acute exposure to a high level of radiation, and 29 people died from it. This is not the case in Fukushima," he said.

And while at Chernobyl the reactor itself had exploded, "in Fukushima... the reactors themselves have stayed intact, although we are seeing some leakage," the official said.

The earthquake and tsunami that crippled the Pacific coast plant in northeast Japan is confirmed to have killed 13,219 people, with more than 14,000 more still unaccounted for.

Nuclear experts have said a partial meltdown took place when the cooling systems failed, causing a series of explosions that leaked radioactive material into the atmosphere.

Tens of thousands of residents were evacuated from an exclusion zone covering a 20-kilometre (12-mile) radius from the plant and many more living close by have been advised to stay indoors.

On Monday the government said it would order people to leave certain areas outside the exclusion zone due to concerns over the effect of long-term exposure to radiation, but that a uniform extension of the zone was not appropriate.

Emergency crews at the plant have battled around the clock to bring the disaster under control and on Monday the government said the danger of a large leak of radioactive materials was becoming "significantly smaller".

Level seven incidents involve a "major release of radioactive material with widespread health and environmental effects requiring implementation of planned and extended countermeasures", according to the UN's International Nuclear Events Scale.

Japan previously ranked the Fukushima crisis at five on the scale. Each increase in level indicates a roughly 10-fold increase in severity.

The meltdown at Chernobyl in the Ukraine spewed a large volume of toxic radiation, poisoning large areas of land and affecting thousands of lives.

The longer-term death toll from the accident ranges from a UN estimate in 2005 of 4,000 to tens or even hundreds of thousands, suggested by non-governmental groups.

Tuesday had earlier seen a 6.2 magnitude tremor hit 77 kilometres east of Tokyo, swaying buildings in the capital, temporarily shutting down subway services and halting bullet trains. US geologists originally put the magnitude at 6.4.

Japan has experienced more than 400 major aftershocks stronger than 5.0 in magnitude since March 11.

In a fresh setback, a fire broke out early Tuesday morning at a battery unit outside a building at Fukushima's No. 4 reactor, but was quickly extinguished and did not spread to other areas, plant operator Tokyo Electric Power said.

The operator said the blaze was not related to Tuesday's quake.

Frayed nerves were strained further Monday when coastal areas were put on alert for a possible tsunami after a 6.6 magnitude quake that killed three people in a landslide in Iwaki city, Fukushima.

Authorities withdrew the warning less than an hour later as the nation marked a month since the disaster, Japan's worst since World War II.

People around the country had fallen silent at 2:46 pm in remembrance of the victims.

Around 150,000 people are still in emergency shelters after losing their homes or being evacuated from around the leaking Fukushima plant.



Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
INES
IAEA Factsheet
Bringing Order To A World Of Disasters
A world of storm and tempest
When the Earth Quakes



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


DISASTER MANAGEMENT
Japan mulls raising nuclear crisis to top level: report
Tokyo (AFP) April 12, 2011
Japan may raise the severity of its nuclear accident to seven - the top level on an international scale - from five, the Kyodo news agency reported Tuesday, as workers battled to contain the crisis. Kyodo said preliminary figures from the country's Nuclear Safety Commission revealed the battered Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant had released up to 10,000 terabecquerels of radioactive materia ... read more







DISASTER MANAGEMENT
Russia Urges Japan To Stop Radioactive Dumping Into Pacific

Inexpensive New Instruments Test Building Sealants Under Real-World Conditions

Japan to widen evacuation zone around nuclear plant

Defective Plastics Repair Themselves

DISASTER MANAGEMENT
Preparations Underway As US Army Gears Up For Large-Scale Network Evaluations

Global Military Communications Market In 2010

Raytheon BBN Technologies To Protect Internet Comms For Military Abroad

Gilat Announces New Military Modem For Robust Tactical Satcom-On-The-Move

DISASTER MANAGEMENT
Arianespace Flight VA201: Interruption Of The Countdown

Mitsubishi Electric's ST-2 Satellite Arrives In French Guiana

Jugnu Set To Go Into Space In June

SpaceX Antes Up With Falcon Heavy

DISASTER MANAGEMENT
Make Your Satnav Idea A Reality

GPS Study Shows Wolves More Reliant On A Cattle Diet

Galileo Labs: Better Positioning With Concept

Compact-Sized GLONASS/GPS Receiver

DISASTER MANAGEMENT
Google's $700 million ITA buy cleared with conditions

Google, Justice Department near deal on ITA: WSJ

Airbus expects A380 sales to rise in China

Australia's Qantas to offload ageing Boeing 737s

DISASTER MANAGEMENT
Technique For Letting Brain Talk To Computers Now Tunes In Speech

Japan's stalled chip sector 'to cost $470bn'

Control The Cursor With Power Of Thought

Self-Cooling Observed In Graphene Electronics

DISASTER MANAGEMENT
Arctic Ozone Loss

Arctic Ice Gets A Check Up

3-D map of Philippines to help combat disasters

For NASA's Aquarius, Quest For Salt A Global Endeavor

DISASTER MANAGEMENT
Italy seizes five container loads of garbage bound for China

Study reveals cost of nitrogen pollution

High Levels Of Toxic Compounds Found On Coasts Of West Africa

EU declares war on plastic litter in Mediterranean


The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2010 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement