![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]()
UPI Senior News Analyst Washington (UPI) May 16, 2007 Japan's defense minister called this week for a further extension and intensification of the already far-reaching ballistic missile defense cooperation between the two nations. The United States and Japan need to start cooperative work on developing new technologies to intercept and destroy high-altitude ballistic missiles, Defense Minister Fumio Kyuma said Tuesday, according to a Kyodo news agency report. Kyodo said Kyuma was speaking in response to reports that North Korea has already built a new IRBM, or intermediate-range ballistic missile. Such a development could change the strategic balance between Japan and North Korea. Japan's ambitious BMD program, vastly expanded and crafted by former Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi during his five years in office, is primarily designed to defend the home islands against shorter range ballistic missiles that would fly at low and intermediate altitudes. They would then be intercepted by either low-level Patriot PAC-3 interceptors or at intermediate altitudes by sea-based Standard Missile-3s guided by the Aegis radar system. But according to Kyodo, Kyuma informed reporters that the latest developments by North Korea mean "there is a need to conduct technological research with the U.S. for high altitude as well." Kyodo said Japanese defense experts believed the new North Korean Musudan IRBM was developed from the old Soviet submarine-launched SSN-6 ballistic missile. North Korea's work horse, the Taepodong-1 missile, has a range of about 900 miles, Kyodo noted. But the Musudan may have a range of more than double that, ranging from 1,500 miles to 2,400 miles. Kyodo quoted Japanese officials as saying the SM-3 was only capable of intercepting IRBMs with a range of up to 900 miles to 1,200 miles
Source: United Press International Related Links Japan Ministry of Defense Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com All about missiles at SpaceWar.com Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com
![]() ![]() Was last week's congressional compromise on U.S. ballistic missile defense funding a disastrous defeat for the program, or was it a resounding victory for ensuring the survival and continued funding of key programs? Was it a bitter, short-sighted bipartisan fight of the kind that gives Congress a bad name? Or was it a triumph for constructive bipartisanship that forged a new and likely lasting consensus for the visionary program between Republicans and Democrats? |
![]() |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright Space.TV Corporation. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space.TV Corp on any Web page published or hosted by Space.TV Corp. Privacy Statement |