One of the key talking points on Saturday for finance ministers meeting in the Scottish town of St Andrews had been working out how to deliver cash from rich to developing countries so they can tackle climate change.

The G20 agreed to work for an "ambitious outcome" at Copenhagen, which aims to cut greenhouse gas emissions. They also "recognised the need to increase significantly and urgently the scale and predictability of finance."

But there was no agreement on how cash should be delivered, although there would be "further work" on the issue, the final communique said.

Nor was there a clear figure for how much G20 countries would commit, although sources had played down hopes that this would be achieved before the meeting started.

With the Copenhagen talks starting on December 7, time is running out for a financial agreement to be in place by then.

"If there isn't an agreement on finance, if there isn't an agreement about contributions to make sure we can deal with this problem, then the Copenhagen agreement is going to be much, much more difficult," Alistair Darling, finance minister of hosts Britain, warned before the final session on Saturday.

Campaigners expressed disappointment at the meeting's outcome.

British charity Oxfam's senior policy adviser Max Lawson said: "The G20 has once again failed to live up to its rhetoric on climate change.

"As the clock ticks towards Copenhagen, the hundreds of millions of people around the world who are already suffering as a result of climate change cannot afford to wait any longer for a deal."

Richard Dixon, director of WWF Scotland, said the failure to reach agreement on funding was a "major disappointment."

"We wanted to see solid proposals on how the money would be raised, managed and distributed and an indication of how soon the countries most vulnerable to climate change will receive assistance," he added.

"The G20 has failed to deliver and the real work will now have to be done at Copenhagen."

Yvo de Boer, the UN's climate chief, said at the end of last month there were two "major opportunities" to make headway on finance before December.

One was the G20 finance ministers meeting in St Andrews the other was an EU summit earlier this month when leaders agreed that developing nations would need 100 billion euros (150 billion dollars) a year annually by 2020, but failed to agree how much individual countries would give.

So has all hope for a finance deal ahead of Copenhagen disappeared?

Darling on Saturday proposed that Britain, which is G20 president until the end of the year, could convene "a small group of countries which have particular problems."

"I am confident we can make progress at Copenhagen," he added.

There are also other chances for the international community to get together.

These include the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum, bilaterals between the United States on one side and China, India and Japan on the other, and meetings between the European Union (EU) and China and India.

There will also be a restricted ministerial-level meeting among key countries in the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) negotiations and talks among major economies that together account for 80 percent of the world's carbon output.

In Copenhagen itself, leaders could be there to give a final push in the closing days or hours -- Brown has said he will be there and Brazilian President Inacio Lula da Silva has urged others to attend.

earlier related report
US may still put emissions proposals at Copenhagen
The United States said on Friday it could still present proposals for curbing its carbon emissions at next month's climate change meeting in Copenhagen, even if Congress was still debating global warming legislation.

Uncertainty about what Washington will propose for reducing its own huge emissions of greenhouse gases has been a major headache for the United Nations' negotiations.

The US has been trying to coax climate-change legislation through Congress, prompting it to be cautious about overstepping its position in the international arena.

The US chief delegate at climate talks in Barcelona, Jonathan Pershing, told reporters on Friday that President Barack Obama's administration was focusing primarily on getting the legislation in place.

"The United States has not yet got that deal done at home, and we are very interested in seeing that deal move forward further before we take a decision as to how we would move internationally," he said.

But, pressed by journalists, he did not rule out putting forward a proposal with numbers in Copenhagen for reducing US emissions.

"It is definitely possible. A decision as to whether or not we will do it has not yet been made," he said.

Two bills have been put to the two chambers of Congress, one that would amount to a cut by 2020 of 17 percent in emissions and the other for a reduction of around 20 percent.

But the benchmark years in both cases would be 2005, a far less onerous target to reach compared with 1990, which is used by most countries.

The Copenhagen marathon is designed to climax a two-year process of negotiations leading to a worldwide agreement for tackling climate change beyond 2012.

The talks have been mired in discord over how to share out the burden for curbing greenhouse-gas pollutions and prime a financial pump to help developing countries switch to a low-carbon technology and adapt to climate change.

The United States plays a linchpin role in the negotiations as it is the world's richest country and second biggest carbon emitter.

Share This Article With Planet Earth

del.icio.us	Digg	Reddit
YahooMyWeb	Google	Facebook

Related Links

Memory Foam Mattress Review

SPACE MEDIA NETWORK PROMOTIONS Solar Energy Solutions Tempur-Pedic Mattress Comparison ... Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News