![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Newtown CT (SPX) Apr 28, 2008 Overall defense spending has skyrocketed in recent years, both in dollar terms and relative to the size of the economy. The spending surge of the past few years can largely be attributed to soaring war costs, which have most recently run upwards of $15 billion per month. While there is a common perception that the huge costs of defense spending should begin tapering off, the fact is that baseline budgets are still on the rise, with FY09's $515 billion request for discretionary spending being the largest yet. In fact, when all defense-related costs are considered, the FY09 defense budget may represent close to 5 percent of GDP. These are among the findings of a recent defense budget review by the Budget Forecasting team of Connecticut-based Forecast International, which is currently finalizing its FY09-FY14 budget projections. These projections are contained within the company's U.S. Defense Budget Forecast Market Intelligence Service. Over and above the requested $515 billion for FY09 baseline budget authority, the President has requested an initial $70 billion in supplemental funding to support war efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the Pentagon is expected to seek upwards of $100 billion more later this year. Additionally, the major military services have outlined approximately $30 billion in requirements that are not supported in the President's FY09 budget. Although they are not requests from a technical standpoint, lawmakers use these lists of unfunded requirements to guide their fiscal decisions over the course of the budget process. Unfunded needs in FY09 include several "big-ticket" items, including a tenth LPD-17 amphibious transport dock ($1.7 billion), 15 C-17 transport aircraft ($3.9 billion), and four F-22 fighters ($600 million). These unfunded needs put pressure on Congress to retool dozens of line items throughout the budget process, which can subsequently impact topline R1 and P1 spending by billions of dollars each year. Another primary concern of military officials and government leaders is the tremendous cost growth spreading throughout the DoD's acquisition infrastructure. The Pentagon, however, is apprehensive about forecasting severe budget cuts or even program cancellations. Can the Air Force afford all 1,763 F-35 Joint Strike Fighters it plans to buy? Will the Navy's DDG-1000 destroyer survive past the first two lead ships? While driven to modernize its wide array of weapons systems, the U.S. military finds itself bogged down in an environment of political uncertainties and burgeoning tensions in the Middle East. These are just some of the variables that FI's team will be taking into careful consideration over the next couple of months as it employs a line-by-line approach to projecting the finalized budgets. Over the past five years, FI's average margin of error in estimating authorized spending levels in RDT and E and procurement accounts - some 1,900 line items - has been l.9 percent. Related Links The Military Industrial Complex at SpaceWar.com Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com
![]() ![]() South Korea will buy 21 fighter jets from Boeing by 2012, bringing to 61 the total number of its next-generation fighters, the defence ministry said Friday. |
![]() |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright Space.TV Corporation. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space.TV Corp on any Web page published or hosted by Space.TV Corp. Privacy Statement |