Space Industry and Business News  
Afghan Hearts And Minds

In a country with illiteracy rates of up to 80 percent it is hard to explain the intricacies of even a good compensation system, let alone the arbitrary and inconsistent outcomes of the one employed by U.S. forces.
by Shaun Waterman
UPI Homeland and National Security Editor
Washington DC (UPI) June 15, 2007
The efforts of the U.S. military to win hearts and minds as part of its counter-insurgency operations in Afghanistan are being undermined by problems with its system for payments to civilian victims of the fighting. "Until this is fixed ... you are going to see anger, resentment and confusion among Afghans," said Sarah Holewinski, executive director of the non-profit advocacy group Campaign for Innocent Victims in Conflict, or CIVIC.

The growing number of non-combatant deaths in fighting between the U.S.-led coalition troops and Taliban insurgents -- and more importantly, the way they are perceived by Afghans -- is likely to be a key determinant of victory in the conflict there, analysts say.

In response to the importance of the issue, and at the urging of CIVIC and other advocacy groups, the U.S. military in 2005 expanded to Afghanistan a system developed in Iraq of so-called condolence payments to the relatives of those civilians killed, and to those injured or suffering property damage, as a result of U.S.-led combat operations.

But two recent studies have found inconsistencies and the undervaluing of Afghan lives in the way the system works.

"The process of filing claims is arbitrary, ad hoc, and can create frustration leading to ill-will towards the United States," concludes CIVIC.

The group, founded by slain U.S. aid worker Marla Ruzicka, analyzed 2000 pages of U.S. military documents detailing claims for compensation by civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan, released in April under the Freedom of Information Act.

The Government Accountability Office, or GAO, also studied the system at the request of lawmakers.

The GAO study found that beginning in October 2005, the Department of Defense authorized U.S. forces in Afghanistan to make payments to non-combatants they injured or killed. The rules allowed payments of up 100,000 Afghanis (approximately $2,400) for a death; up to $470 for serious injury; and up to $250 for property damage.

CIVIC said this represented a "low and seemingly arbitrary valuation of life."

"The system is problematic ... because they arbitrarily cap the payments at $2,500," the group's Marla Bertagnolli told United Press International.

In the 12 months after the system was set up, the GAO found, approximately $350,000 dollars worth of condolence payments were made, either from units' regular operating budgets or from a special reconstruction contingency fund, known as the Commanders Emergency Response Program, or CERP.

Condolence payments are one of 19 purposes for which funds from CERP can be spent, and made up just over half of 1 percent of all the funds disbursed under the program.

The GAO also found that Pentagon guidance on the payments did not adequately distinguish between the different types of payments that could be made, and that therefore there was "inconsistent reporting" of the handling and disposition of claims.

The authorization "does not require (U.S. military) commanders to make payments, but instead permits commanders to make payments if they choose," found the GAO. "Commanders exercise broad discretion for determining whether a payment should be made and the appropriate payment amount."

But CIVIC found that the net effect of this discretion is inconsistency.

"It is apparent that different (officials) take different approaches and come to different conclusions when faced when substantially similar facts," reads their analysis.

Finally, the group found that the military judge advocates who made decisions about the payments relied excessively on military records "over other relevant materials, often to the exclusion of important documentation supporting a claimant's case."

"The program fails properly (to) deliver justice to civilians and, ultimately therefore, to achieve its goal of winning the support of the civilian population," their analysis concludes.

In a country with illiteracy rates of up to 80 percent, said Holewinski, it was hard to explain the intricacies of even a good compensation system, let alone the arbitrary and inconsistent outcomes of the one employed by U.S. forces.

"They see U.S. forces, U.S. airstrikes ... what they are not going to understand is why they got nothing, and people in a nearby village" were compensated, she said.

Source: United Press International

Related Links
Campaign for Innocent Victims in Conflict (CIVIC)
News From Across The Stans



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Gates Points To Iran As Source Of Weapons To Taliban
Ramstein Air Base, Germany (AFP) Jun 13, 2007
US Defence Secretary Robert Gates Wednesday said "substantial" quantities of Iranian weapons are flowing into Afghanistan and it is difficult to believe the Iranian government is not aware of it. Gates, who in the past has refrained from pointing the finger directly at the Iranian government, said recent anlysis "makes it pretty clear there is a substantial flow of weapons."







  • Rockwell Collins And ARINC Sign Agreement For Broadband Offering
  • Academic Group Releases Plan To Share Power Over Internet Root Zone Keys
  • Satellite Enables Mobile Wireless Broadband Services To Conventional Devices
  • Singapore Airlines Selects Rockwell Collins Satellite Communications

  • SES Signs For Five ILS Protons Through 2013
  • ILS Wins Arabsat-5A Contract To Launch On Proton Breeze M
  • Dawn Spacecraft Never Damaged Set To Launch July 7
  • Proton-M Rocket With US Satellite To Lift Off July 7

  • EU And US Launch Airline Pollution Initiative
  • easyJet Plans Greener Aircraft By 2015
  • Airbus Wants To Cut CO2 Emissions By Half By 2020
  • Airlines To Order Nearly 30,000 New Planes In Next 20 Years

  • First Wideband Global SATCOM Satellite Packed And Ready For Shipment
  • Major Integration Milestone Achieved On Advanced Military Communications Satellite
  • Boeing-Led Team Responding To TSAT Space Segment Request For Proposals
  • KVH Receives Order For Fiber Optic Gyro-based TACNAV II Vehicle Navigation System

  • Wind River Carrier-Grade Linux Goes To Space
  • Nanoparticles Unlock The Future Of Superalloy Metals
  • Australia Weighs In To Make The Perfect kilogram
  • German Radar Satellite TerraSAR-X Launched

  • Hall Appoints Feeney To Top GOP Position On Space And Aeronautics Subcommittee
  • Dodgen Joins Northrop Grumman As Vice President Of Strategy For Missile Systems Business
  • Townsend To Lead Ball Aerospace Exploration Systems In Huntsville
  • NASA Nobel Prize Recipient To Lead Chief Scientist Office

  • Ukraine To Launch Earth Observation Satellite In 2008
  • NASA Satellites Watch as China Constructs Giant Dam
  • Kalam Calls For Development Of Satellite Systems For Entire Humanity
  • Boeing Launches Italian Earth Observation Satellite

  • AeroAstro Extends Globalstar Simplex Data Service Eastern Australia And New Zealand
  • Albertis Seeks Share In Galileo Partner Hispasat As Surrey Welcomes EU Support
  • EU Agrees Galileo Needs Public Bailout
  • EU To Back Galileo Bailout And But Faces Tough Talks On New Funds

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright Space.TV Corporation. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space.TV Corp on any Web page published or hosted by Space.TV Corp. Privacy Statement