|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| . |  |
. |
|
|
|
 by Staff Writers Washington (AFP) May 29, 2014
If Wall Street struggles to see the logic in Apple's $3 billion deal for Beats Music, it may look across the river to Brooklyn, hometown of Beats co-founder Jimmy Iovine. Apple's biggest-ever acquisition includes the maker of high-end audio equipment and a streaming music service, but more importantly, the talent of Beats brains Dr. Dre and Iovine. The wild card in the deal could be Iovine, 61, a Brooklyn native and son of a longshoreman who started in the business by cleaning studios and later was a recording engineer for John Lennon and Bruce Springsteen, before becoming a producer. "He's a real music guy and well-liked by artists," one industry executive told AFP. "He is old-school. He didn't come out of management school, but had music in his blood, and artists connect to that," said the executive, who asked not to be identified. Iovine, a producer for U2, Dire Straits, Stevie Nicks, Tom Petty and The Heartbreakers, and Patti Smith, is seen by some as a visionary for recognizing the trend of online streaming and subscriptions -- and away from Apple's model of purchasing individual songs on the Internet. - Skepticism on value - "The way to find out what's really going on in music is to talk to record producers," Iovine said in an interview at the 2013 Grammy Awards, where he was recognized for his contributions to the industry. "They have their pulse on everything. They live in the recording studio. They have the feel of the artists." Iovine was key in helping persuade Apple chief Steve Jobs in 2002 to launch the iTunes store, according to several accounts of Apple's history. Yet for some, Apple's tie-up with a company best known for its high-end headphones is a mismatch. "The deal seems to be out of line with Apple's history of acquisitions of technology, and we struggle to see the value," said Bank of America-Merrill Lynch analyst Scott Craig in a research note. The private company research firm PrivCo said in a research note that Apple may have been "starstruck" and as a result "is substantially overpaying" for Beats. The analysis claims Beats is "practically a 'virtual company' with only a few dozen employees focused on a celebrity driven market" and "little to no original intellectual property." Other analysts see more harmony in the deal for Apple, a pioneer in digital music but which appears to have been overtaken by the successful models of streaming services like Pandora, Spotify and others. The news comes after Spotify's announcement that it had 40 million users, including 10 million paying customers, and Pandora had over 76 million listeners while leading the ad-supported model. "Apple believes it's acquiring a leading team -- headlined by Jimmy Iovine, Dr. Dre (Andre Young) and Ian Rogers -- that can help Apple improve and launch new services," said Morgan Stanley's Katy Huberty. - A better strategy? - Amit Daryanani at RBC Capital Markets said the acquisition can help Apple improve its music strategy. "In our view, the iTunes music strategy, which has been challenged recently, could benefit from the new hires," Daryanani said in a note to clients. "Notably, Iovine was one of the first industry executives to anticipate the download business decline and advocate for subscription and streaming services as music's future." Trip Chowdhry, analyst with Global Equities Research, said Beats can help Apple improve its iTunes Radio, which he called "a total disaster" while Beats offers "one of the best streaming music experiences." He said that Beats has just 250,000 subscribers "but with Apple's power in distribution (iOS devices and AppStore), subscription to Beats' music streaming service can easily grow to 20 million subscribers within the next 12 to 18 months." Others say Beats could help Apple deliver wearable and smart-home products based on Beats designs. "If Apple is buying Beats purely for its headphones or music subscription business, then Apple is making a mistake," said Forrester Research analyst James McQuivey in a blog post. "However, there are those of us who still believe that Apple hasn't thrown in the towel. And why would it?" he said. "There are still many consumer markets to dominate -- entire markets like wearables and home automation tech and even in-car experiences... Apple still has the smarts, the brand, and certainly the money to make a run for any of those things, if not all of them."
Apple-Beats deal one of biggest in tech sector Here are some other notable deals involving US tech companies, in order of dollar amount from largest to smallest: + HEWLETT-PACKARD BUYS COMPAQ - SEPTEMBER 2001 US technology giant Hewlett-Packard buys Compaq Computer for $25 billion in a bid to compete with IBM. + FACEBOOK BUYS WHATSAPP - FEBRUARY 2014 The world's biggest social network Facebook bets big on mobile with an eye-popping cash-and-stock deal worth up to $19 billion for smartphone messaging service WhatsApp. Regulators have yet to green light the deal. + GOOGLE BUYS MOTOROLA MOBILITY - AUGUST 2011 Internet search giant Google buys the handset business of Motorola for $12.5 billion in a bid to challenge Apple in the smartphone market. Less than three years later, Google sold Motorola to China's Lenovo for $2.91 billion. + HEWLETT-PACKARD BUYS AUTONOMY - AUGUST 2011 US technology giant Hewlett-Packard buys British enterprise software company Autonomy for $10.24 billion. US authorities later open an investigation amid HP accusations that Autonomy had engaged in "accounting improprieties." + MICROSOFT BUYS SKYPE - MAY 2011 Microsoft buys Internet voice and video leader Skype for $8.5 billion, the largest acquisition ever by the US software giant. + ORACLE BUYS SUN - APRIL 2009 US business software giant Oracle buys struggling Sun Microsystems and its Java programming language for $7.4 billion. + MICROSOFT BUYS NOKIA - SEPTEMBER 2013 Microsoft buys the handset business of former market leader Nokia for $7.2 billion in an effort to catch up to rivals Apple and Google in the smartphone market. + MICROSOFT BUYS AQUANTIVE - MAY 2007 Microsoft pays $6 billion for online advertising firm aQuantive. At the time, the price is deemed too high. Five years later, the tech giant takes a $6.2 billion writedown to reflect the slump in value of its online services division, largely related to the aQuantive deal. + GOOGLE BUYS NEST LABS - JANUARY 2014 Google says it is buying smart thermostat start-up Nest in a deal valued at $3.2 billion, continuing its move into consumer electronics hardware. + GOOGLE BUYS DOUBLECLICK - MARCH 2008 The Internet titan seals the deal on its purchase of online ad tracking firm DoubleClick for $3.1 billion. + FACEBOOK BUYS OCULUS - MARCH 2014 Facebook announces a $2 billion deal to buy Oculus, a start-up behind virtual reality headgear. + GOOGLE BUYS YOUTUBE - OCTOBER 2006 Internet search giant Google buys online video platform YouTube in October 2006 from its founders, Steve Chen and Chad Hurley, for $1.65 billion. + EBAY BUYS PAYPAL - JUNE 2002 Online auction house eBay buys online payments firm PayPal for $1.5 billion. + YAHOO BUYS TUMBLR - MAY 2013 Former Google executive Marissa Mayer makes her biggest purchase since taking over as CEO of Yahoo, buying the popular blogging platform Tumblr for $1.1 billion. + FACEBOOK BUYS INSTAGRAM - APRIL 2012 Facebook offers $1 billion for hot smartphone photo-sharing service Instagram. The purchase of Instagram was Facebook's largest until the WhatsApp deal.
Related Links Satellite-based Internet technologies
|
|
|
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2014 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement All images and articles appearing on Space Media Network have been edited or digitally altered in some way. Any requests to remove copyright material will be acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. Any attempt to extort money from Space Media Network will be ignored and reported to Australian Law Enforcement Agencies as a potential case of financial fraud involving the use of a telephonic carriage device or postal service. |
del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Google
